Presentation: Valuation Of Health States for Scleroderma and Psoriatic Arthritis by the General Public: Community Weights for Future Decision and Cost-effectiveness Analyses (2007)

1510 Valuation Of Health States for Scleroderma and Psoriatic Arthritis by the General Public: Community Weights for Future Decision and Cost-effectiveness Analyses

Objective: The US Public Health Service Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine recommends assessing utilities (health values or quality-of-life weights) from the general public rather than from patients with the condition being evaluated. Our objective was to assess community utilities for health states common to people with scleroderma (SSc) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA).
Methods: Subjects were recruited through flyers and advertisements in local newspapers and completed 2 health status measures, the SF-12 version 2 and the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI); rated their own health on a 0-100 rating scale (RS); and completed computer-assisted time trade-off (TTO, possible range: 0.0-1.0) and standard gamble (SG, possible range: 0.0-1.0) utility assessments for their own health. Subjects next were given a brief description of several SSc and PsA health states derived from the Quality of Well-being scale and were asked to imagine living in each of those states for the rest of their lives. Each subject assessed 3 of the following SSc health states: mild SSc, moderate SSc, severe SSc, moderate SSc with lung disease, and severe SSc with lung disease; and either mild PsA, moderate PsA, or severe PsA.
Results: A total of 218 adults completed the study; 135 (62%) were female, 143 (66%) were Caucasian, and 62 (28%) were African-Americans. The median scores for the PCS-12 (52.0), MCS-12 (49.0), and HAQ-DI (0.12) were close to population norms. Subjects’ TTO and SG utilities for their own health were generally high, and utilities for SSc and PsA were generally inversely related to health state severity (Table 1).
Conclusion: We provide community weights for future decision and cost-effectiveness analyses in SSc and PsA.
NumberMedian
Score
25th-75th
Percentile
Self RS21885.075-90
Self TTO2180.9980.93-1.00
Self SG2180.9920.88-1.00
Mild SSc
Mild RS9470.060-80
Mild TTO940.940.67-0.99
Mild SG940.900.75-0.99
Moderate SSc
Moderate RS17258.545-70
Moderate TTO1720.750.50- 0.93
Moderate SG1720.820.51-0.97
Moderate SSc with lung
Moderate_lung RS17750.033-60
Moderate_lung TTO1770.630.38-0.86
Moderate_lung SG1770.750.50-0.94
Severe SSc
Severe RS12030.020-40
Severe TTO1200.300.11-0.56
Severe SG1200.500.23-0.75
Severe SSc with lung
Severe_lung RS9020.013-35
Severe_lung TTO900.280.12-0.58
Severe_lung SG900.500.24-0.75
Mild PSA
Mild RS7070.050-80
Mild TTO700.880.63-0.99
Mild SG700.910.75-0.98
Moderate PSA
Moderate RS7850.036-60
Moderate TTO780.690.25-0.81
Moderate SG780.750.50-0.92
Severe PSA
Severe RS6615.00.03-0.50
Severe TTO660.150.03-0.50
Severe SG660.500.09-0.75

  D. Khanna, NIH (grant HD-051953), 2; R. Kaplan, None; M. Eckman, None; S. Ginsburg, None; R.D. Hays, None; J. Tsevat, None.