Purpose: Data on the
withdrawal rates of different TNF-inhibitors (TNF-I) in clinical practice are
scarce. The aim was to determine 4-year drug survival of the different TNF-I
and calculate Hazard Ratios (HRs) of their withdrawal based on the DANBIO
registry.
Methods:
2935 RA patients (832 (28%) adalimumab, 703 (24%) etanercept, 1400 (48%)
infliximab) were followed from start of first TNF-I treatment to withdrawal of
treatment or Oct 1st 2008 (whichever came first). HRs were calculated
correcting for baseline disease activity, age, disease duration, concomitant
methotrexate and prednisolone, number of previous DMARDs, HAQ score and
hospital department. Propensity scores and various subanalyses gave similar
results, not shown.
Results:
Figure shows 4 years' (unadjusted) drug survival: adalimumab:56%(95%CI:51-61%);
etanercept:63%(58-68%); infliximab:44%(41-47%), p<0.0001, log rank test.
Below the figure, numbers of events and numbers of patients at risk at
different time points for each drug are shown.
HRs for drug withdrawal, incl. subanalyses by reason for withdrawal, are shown
in table.
Table:
Hazard Ratios (95% CI) for drug withdrawal | |||
| Adalimumab vs. etanercept | Infliximab vs. etanercept | Infliximab vs. adalimumab |
All pts (1099 events) | 1.56 (1.26-1.94) | 2.10 (1.70-2.59 | 1.35 (1.13-1.61) |
LOE (727 events) | 1.51 (1.17-1.96) | 1.73 (1.35-2.23) | 1.15 (0.92-1.42) |
AE (327 events) | 1.73 (1.14-2.62) | 3.19 (2.15-4.72) | 1.85 (1.35-2.52) |
LOE: lack of efficacy; AE: adverse event | |||
Conclusion:
In this nationwide follow-up study of 2935 RA patients, 4 years' drug survival
was highest for etanercept. After correcting for differences in baseline
characteristics, the hazard ratio for withdrawal was overall highest for
infliximab and lowest for etanercept regardless of reason for withdrawal.
Disclosure of Interest: The DANBIO registry received unrestricted grants from Abbott, BMS,
Roche, Schering-Plough, UCB Nordic and Wyeth.
![[ Visit Client Website ]](images/banner.gif)
