Method: We studied 51 AS patients (28 on standard and 23 on Anti-TNF treatment) followed prospectively who had MRI at baseline and at follow up (mean of 17.9 months), and radiography of the cervical and lumbar spine at baseline and 2 years. A persistent CIL was defined as being present on both MRI scans whilst a resolved CIL was defined as present at baseline MRI and completely disappeared at follow up MRI. The anterior vertebral corners on anonymised MRI were assessed independently and blinded to patient, treatment, and radiography by 2 readers. We conducted the following comparisons:1. proportion of new syndesmophytes developing at each anterior VC from a resolved inflammatory lesion at the corresponding VC; 2. the proportion of new syndesmophytes developing at each anterior VC from a persistent inflammatory lesion at the corresponding VC; 3. proportion of new syndesmophytes developing at each anterior VC where there is no prior inflammatory lesion. Proportions were compared by the Pearson chi-square analysis of the reader concordant data and discordant data was not included in this analysis.
Results: For patients receiving anti-TNF therapy, new syndesmophytes developed significantly more frequently in those vertebral corners with inflammation on MRI at baseline (10.3%) as compared to those that were normal on MRI (1.4%) (p = 0.001). For patients receiving standard treatment, new syndesmophytes developed in 12.5% of vertebral corners with inflammation at baseline as compared to 2.9% of those without (p = 0.01). New syndesmophytes developed in an even higher percentage of CIL that resolved following anti-TNF therapy (27.3%).
New syndesmophyte
| Treatment | Resolved CIL | Persistent CIL | Normal VC | P value |
Yes | Anti-TNF | 3 (27.3) | 0 | 5 (1.7) | <0.0001 |
No | 8 (72.7) | 3 | 282 (98.3) | ||
Yes | Standard | 1 (16.7) | 0 | 16 (3.3) | NS |
No | 5 (83.3) | 10 | 463 (96.7) |
Conclusion: This study of AS spines documents that MRI findings predict subsequent damage on X-ray. Further, the demonstration of an increased likelihood of developing new bone following resolution of inflammation offers strong support for the “TNF brake hypothesis”.
Disclosure: P. Chiowchanwisawakit, None; S. J. Pedersen, None; R. G. Lambert, None; M. Ostergaard, None; W. P. Maksymowych, None.
![[Visit Client Website]](/img/acr/banner_2009.gif)
Search
Print Page
Browse by Day: