1895 - TEAR: Treatment of Early Aggressive Ra; A Randomized, Double-Blind, 2-Year Trial Comparing Immediate Triple DMARD Versus MTX Plus Etanercept to Step-up From Initial MTX Monotherapy

Tuesday, October 20, 2009: 12:15 PM
Ballroom AB (Pennsylvania Convention Center)
Larry W. Moreland1, James R. O'Dell2, Harold Paulus3, Jeffrey R. Curtis4, S.L. Bridges Jr.4, Xiao Zhang4, George Howard4 and Stacey S. Cofield4, 1Univ of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 2University of Nebraska Med Ctr and Omaha VA, Omaha, NE, 3UCLA School of Med, Los Angeles, CA, 4The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
Presentation Number: 1895

Purpose: No direct data compares triple DMARD (methotrexate [MTX], sulfasalazine [SSZ], hydroxychloroquine [HCQ]) to MTX + anti-TNF therapy (etanercept) in patients with early RA. The relative benefit of a strategy of either combination vs MTX monotherapy with step-up after 6 months is also uncertain. The TEAR trial evaluates both issues.

Methods: The investigator-initiated, multi-center, randomized TEAR trial began in 2004 and enrolled 755 participants to compare immediate (I) vs step-up (S) strategy with MTX, etanercept (E) and triple DMARD (T) in 4 arms: immediate MTX + E (IE) or triple therapy (IT); step-up from MTX to MTX+E (SE) or to T (ST). In SE/ST, if DAS28 ≥ 3.2 at 6 months of MTX, patients were blindly stepped-up to IE/IT. Inclusion criteria: disease duration ≤ 3yrs, diagnosis by ACR criteria; RF+, CCP+ or ≥ 2 radiographic erosions; ≥ 4 tender and 4 swollen joints; MTX naïve. The primary endpoint was mean DAS28 from weeks 48-102. Other endpoints: ACR 20, 50, 70; discontinuation for lack of efficacy, DAS28 remission, QOL and Radiographic progression.

Results:   Subjects were 72% female; 80% Caucasian, 11% African American; with a mean age at entry of 49±13 yrs, with 3.6±6.5 months since diagnosis, 90% RF+. The mean DAS28 at entry 5.8±1.1; 28 joint count: 14.3±6.8 painful and 12.8±6.0 swollen joints. As shown in the Table, during the second year of treatment, patients randomized to S arms had clinical responses that were not statistically different than those who received I combination therapy, regardless of treatment arm (p-values: I vs S: 0.95, E vs T: 0.23). There were significant differences in the outcome of ACR response at 6 months between treatment arms: patients initially receiving IE or IT were significantly more likely to achieve an ACR 20/50/70 response at 6 months than those randomized to step-up arms (all p < 0.0001), regardless of treatment (E vs T).

 

Conclusions:      A 2-year double-blinded trial of early RA patients found no differences in the mean levels of DAS28 during weeks 48-102 among patients randomized to etanercept or triple DMARD, regardless of whether they received immediate combination treatment or MTX monotherapy with a step-up. At 6 months immediate combination treatment with either strategy was more effective than MTX monotherapy; however, there were no significant differences in groups at 2 years. Initial use of MTX monotherapy with the addition of SSZ/HCQ or etanercept, if necessary after 6 months, is a reasonable therapeutic strategy for early RA.

 

Treatment arm

DAS28
at week 102

ACR response at 6 months

ACR 20, %

ACR50, %

ACR70, %

IE

3.0 ± 1.4

63.6

35.5

13.1

IT

2.9 ± 1.5

64.0

38.6

11.4

SE

3.1 ± 1.4

45.2

22.1

3.2

ST

2.8 ± 1.3

47.7

21.5

4.7


Keywords: DMARDs, clinical trials and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

Disclosure: L. W. Moreland, Amgen, 2, Barr Pharmaceuticals, 2, Pharmacia, 2, NIAMS-NIH, 2, NIH, 2 ; J. R. O'Dell, Amgen, 5 ; H. Paulus, Amgen, 5 ; J. R. Curtis, Roche Pharmaceuticals, 5, UCB, 5, Proctor & Gamble Pharmaceuticals, 5, Amgen, 5, Centocor, Inc., 5, Corrona, 5, Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, 2, Amgen, 2, Proctor & Gamble Pharmaceuticals, 2, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, Roche Pharmaceuticals, 2, Centocor, Inc., 2, Corrona, 2, Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, 8, Proctor & Gamble Pharmaceuticals, 8, Eli Lilly and Company, 8, Roche Pharmaceuticals, 8, Merck Pharmaceuticals, 8 ; S. L. Bridges Jr., None; X. Zhang, None; G. Howard, Amgen, 2 ; S. S. Cofield, GlaxoSmithKline, 5 .