Presentation: In Early RA with Insufficient Response to MTX, the Addition of Anti-TNF Results in Less Radiological Progression Over 24 Months Than the Addition of Conventional DMARDs: Results From the SWEFOT Trial (ACR/ARHP Annual Scientific Meeting)

LB6 - In Early RA with Insufficient Response to MTX, the Addition of Anti-TNF Results in Less Radiological Progression Over 24 Months Than the Addition of Conventional DMARDs: Results From the SWEFOT Trial

Tuesday, October 20, 2009: 3:45 PM
204 B (Pennsylvania Convention Center)
Ronald F. van Vollenhoven, The Karolinska Institute and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden, Kristina Albertsson, Department of Rheumatology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden, Kristina Forslind, Department of Rheumatology, Helsingborgs Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden, P. Geborek, Dept of Clinical Sciences, Lund, Section of Rheumatology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, Sofia Ernestam, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden, Ingemar F. Petersson, Musculoskeletal Research Center, Lund, Sweden, Johan Bratt, Karolinska Univ Hosp Huddinge, Stockholm and SWEFOT study group, Sweden
Presentation Number: LB6

Purpose: We previously reported that, in patients with early RA who failed to respond to MTX monotherapy, the addition of anti-TNF was clinically superior at 12 months to the addition of DMARDs (Lancet 374:459;2009). Here, we compared the effects on radiological progression over 2 years of these two therapeutic strategies.

 

Methods: Patients with early RA (symptom duration <1 year) who failed to achieve DAS28<3.2 after 3-4 months of MTX monotherapy were randomized to the addition of either SSZ 2000 mg/d + HCQ 400 mg/d (arm A, n=130) or infliximab (INF) 3 mg/kg (arm B, n=128). Radiographs taken at baseline, 12 and 24 months were scored according to the Van der Heijde - Sharp (SvdH) method by two readers blinded to treatment assignment. The data were analyzed primarily according to intention-to-treat. No extrapolations or imputations were applied. We also separately analyzed per-protocol (PP) completers. Comparisons were by Wilcoxon rank-test for paired and Mann-Whitney U-test for unpaired values.

 

Results: In the ITT populations, statistically significant radiographic progression from baseline was seen in both groups after 12 months, whereas during the second year significant progression was seen in group A (conventional therapy) but not in group B (anti-TNF). Mean±SEM (median, IQR) increases in SvdH total scores at 12 and 24 months were 5.04±10.64 (1, 0-7.5) and 7.23±12.72 (3, 0-14.25) for group A, versus 2.95±6.07 (0, 0-5) and 4.00±10.05 (1, 0-6) for group B. The difference in progression from baseline to 24 months between the groups was statistically significant for total SvdH score (p=0.009) as well as for erosion score (p=0.039) and joint-space narrowing (p=0.026) separately.  The difference in total SvdH progression between 12 and 24 months was also significant (p=0.011).

In PP completers at 24 months, significantly greater progression occurred during year 2 in group A than in group B (p=0.013). In group B completers, progression during year 2 was minimal at 0.10±3.19 (0, IQR 0-1), versus 2.77±7.76 (0, 0-3) for group A completers.

 

Conclusions: In patients with early RA who after 3-4 months on MTX had not achieved a DAS28 < 3.2, the addition of INF yielded significantly better radiological results through 24 months than the addition of SSZ+HCQ.


Under the assumption that an initial trial with MTX monotherapy is adequate, the subsequent addition of anti-TNF is superior concerning radiological progression to the addition of these conventional DMARDs.

 


Keywords: anti-TNF therapy, clinical trials and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

Disclosure: R. F. van Vollenhoven, Abbott, Schering-Plough, UCB Pharma, Wyeth, 2, Abbott, Schering-Plough, UCB, Wyeth, 5 ; K. Albertsson, None; K. Forslind, None; P. Geborek, None; S. Ernestam, None; I. F. Petersson, Anamar Medical, 1 ; J. Bratt, None.